<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pseudo Explanations</title>
	<link>http://truehorizon.org/2006/09/05/pseudo-explanations/</link>
	<description>Where Clear Thinking Faith Meets The Real World</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: True Horizon &#187; Beware of Geneticists Bearing Compassion</title>
		<link>http://truehorizon.org/2006/09/05/pseudo-explanations/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>True Horizon &#187; Beware of Geneticists Bearing Compassion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 18:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://truehorizon.org/2006/09/05/pseudo-explanations/#comment-807</guid>
		<description>[...] There are huge problems that have been identified with trying to &#8220;benchmark&#8221; the human genome. Not the least of which is the unknown interactions and dependencies that exist within it. We can&#8217;t even decipher the hidden meaning of what has previously been labeled &#8220;junk DNA,&#8221; but has since been found to be anything but &#8220;junk&#8221;. In short, we have no idea how messing with one area of the code &#8212; in our misguided attempt to &#8220;fix&#8221; it &#8212; will affect other areas. This could bring new meaning to the term &#8220;unintended consequences.&#8221; This is not to say that we shouldn&#8217;t seek gene therapy to prevent and cure disease. That&#8217;s laudable. But, as the article points out, gene-disease claims have a lousy track record. Of those for complex diseases involving multiple genes, notably mental illness, few have been confirmed. And when scientists have tried to validate a claim the results have been sobering. Geneticists &#8230; recently examined 85 variants (translation: &#8220;misspellings&#8220;) in 70 genes that studies had linked to increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Exactly zero of the variants were more frequent in heart patients than in healthy patients. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] There are huge problems that have been identified with trying to &#8220;benchmark&#8221; the human genome. Not the least of which is the unknown interactions and dependencies that exist within it. We can&#8217;t even decipher the hidden meaning of what has previously been labeled &#8220;junk DNA,&#8221; but has since been found to be anything but &#8220;junk&#8221;. In short, we have no idea how messing with one area of the code &#8212; in our misguided attempt to &#8220;fix&#8221; it &#8212; will affect other areas. This could bring new meaning to the term &#8220;unintended consequences.&#8221; This is not to say that we shouldn&#8217;t seek gene therapy to prevent and cure disease. That&#8217;s laudable. But, as the article points out, gene-disease claims have a lousy track record. Of those for complex diseases involving multiple genes, notably mental illness, few have been confirmed. And when scientists have tried to validate a claim the results have been sobering. Geneticists &#8230; recently examined 85 variants (translation: &#8220;misspellings&#8220;) in 70 genes that studies had linked to increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Exactly zero of the variants were more frequent in heart patients than in healthy patients. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
