True Horizon

Where Clear Thinking Faith Meets The Real World

The Classroom: No Place For Questions!

Filed under: Darwinism, General, Science and Faith — Bob at 7:12 pm on Thursday, March 22, 2007

The world is flat; Marxism works; the Earth is at the physical center of the universe; man was not meant to fly, and Darwinian Evolution explains the origination and diversity of all life.

Some day all these ideas will be relegated to the same dustbin of history — but it won’t be today. No, today Kris Helphinstine, a part-time high school biology teacher was fired. Why?

Helphinstine, 27, said in a phone interview with The Bulletin newspaper of Bend that he included supplemental material to teach students about bias in [biology text book] sources, and his only agenda was to teach critical thinking.

That was enough for the Sisters, Oregon School Board, which fired the teacher Monday night for deviating from the curriculum on the theory of evolution.

You’ll notice that Helphinstine was not doing anything illegal or immoral. He wasn’t selling crack cocaine to students. He wasn’t having sex with his students. He didn’t bring guns and ammo to school. Those kind of offenses just get you put on “administrative leave” while an investigation is launched regarding your “alleged” conduct.

No, Helphinstine was fired on the spot for having the audacity to suggest that students should learn to investigate truth claims for themselves. He was fired for not submitting to the Darwinist Orthodoxy that must remain unquestioned in our public schools. He was fired for having the audacity to promote the idea that students should be allowed to ask questions about the most profound and important issues surrounding their very being and existence.

Can’t have that.

Sisters, Oregon Board Member Jeff Smith was incensed by Helphinstine’s radical notion:

“I think his performance was not just a little bit over the line,” Smith said. “It was a severe contradiction of what we trust teachers to do in our classrooms.”

Following Smith’s view to its logical conclusion, society should be happy with indoctrination. It is what we “trust our teachers to do in our classrooms.”

I respectfully disagree.

While I also believe we have no right to indoctrinate students into any brand of Creationist orthodoxy, Helphinstine was doing no such thing. He was simply suggesting that students be allowed to examine the evidence about Evolution for themselves. It never ceases to amaze me that such an idea is controversial.

The irony of these type cases is that those who allegedly stand for the pursuit of truth as demonstrated by and objective practice of the scientific method are the very ones who:

  • Ignore or disregard the scientific evidence they claim to trust
  • Disallow any scrutiny or critique of the evidence or theories they hold dear
  • Berate and dismiss those who aren’t getting with the program which promotes their own orthodoxy

Meanwhile, those who are accused of trying to impose the theocratic establishment (both political and scientific) of their religion on an unsuspecting society are happy to:

  • Welcome scrutiny of the actual evidence
  • Follow the evidence where it leads because they are confident and unafraid of the Truth

It really is amazing that the Darwinian Dogmatists exhibit every one of the attributes of the intolerant religionists they so claim to fear and abhor. My hope is that Kris Helphinstine will find gainful employment in a place that does have an authentic desire to know the truth and is not afraid of where it might find that truth or where that truth might lead.

Apparently, but unfortunately, the contemporary public classroom is not that kind of place.

2 Comments »

11

Comment by Keith McLachlan

March 23, 2007 @ 9:40 pm

Hephinstine exercised poor judgement. He shouldn’t have used Bible quotes in school.

It is strange that he was only eight days into his job before he decided to deviate from the curriculum. I can wonder what was he thinking?

Finally, dispite what the article above says, creationists do not welcome criticism. After they have attained their Ph.D they often publish books, but they rarely publish scientific papers.

12

Comment by Bob

March 26, 2007 @ 7:43 pm

Hey Keith,
Sorry I haven\’t responded to your comment … just saw it. I think you missed my point and that you don\’t understand where I\’m coming from.

First, the question is not about whether or not he \”deviated from the curriculum.\” Yes, he did. The question is not even about what he used to deviate from the curriculum. The question is: Why is the educational establishment so afraid of scrutiny with respect to the curriculum?! Education is supposed to be about learning to think for yourself given input from (possibly contradictory) sources.

Why are you, or the Sister\’s school board, so opposed to kids being allowed to do that? This is not education. It is indoctrination.

Second, I don\’t know how to make it any more clear. I AM a Creationist and I DO welcome criticism. Let\’s hear yours. I am happy to engage the issues based on fact, logic and evidence. What is it exactly that you would like to discuss?

Also I find it a little disingenuous that you criticize \”Creationists\” for not publishing scientific papers. Just like the school board discussed above, the scientific establishment refuses to publish divergent views about these issues, then badmouths the Creationist authors because they haven\’t been published. A little self-serving don\’t you think? I would be interested in seeing all the published works by the scientific establishment regarding the Origin of Life. Maybe you can find some. I can\’t.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>