True Horizon

To follow up on my earlier post … Lest there was ever any confusion about the issue, a report in the May 26, 2007 issue of World magazine casts all doubt aside. Guillermo Gonzalez was denied tenure at Iowa State University because he has ties to the Intelligent Design community. The Discovery Institute has also weighed in on the issue here.

It is a sad day in America when the university — supposedly a bastion for the intellectual pursuit of truth — demands that all who enter adhere to a dogmatic list of beliefs that limits how that truth may be defined.

I wish Mr. Gonzalez the best with his appeal in the case but am sadly pessimistic about its outcome. But let there be no doubt; It is academic freedom, and the political freedom to which it is inevitably tied, that is really at stake here.

For those who may be interested, the Summer issue of Marriage Partnership contains an article by yours truly regarding an experience Mary and I shared several years ago. It includes some thoughts about how truly clueless I was in my lame attempts to help her deal with what was, and still is, a traumatic event in out lives. The article stems from something I wrote at the time and then left stashed in a drawer, hoping I would forget about it. A few months ago I ran across the piece, dusted it off, and submitted it for publication. After some serious editing, it showed up on-line here.

I will be interviewed by a John & Stephanie of WORD FM (101.5) Pittsburgh about the whole ordeal on May 30th at 5:10 EDT. If you happen to be driving through Pittsburgh at the time, give a listen. If not, please join me in praying that I don’t say something too stupid …

I recently read about the results of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) — a nationwide survey of 16,475 college students conducted between 1982 and 2006. In a nutshell, the survey revealed that the narcissistic attitudes of our youth have risen steadily over the past 25 years. In its latest iteration, two-thirds of the students demonstrated above average narcissism — up more that 30% since 1982.

Reading this reminded me of another survey conducted during the 1990s wherein a research group studying the state of American education released a report comparing the math scores of U.S. and Japanese high school students. The results were not surprising. The Japanese students scored significantly higher than their American counterparts on an equivalent test. But what was notable was the response to a question asked of both groups of students right after they had finished taking the test but before they had seen the results. The Japanese students overwhelmingly expressed dejection and embarrassment for what they considered to be a poor performance on the test. The American students were confident they had aced it.

On hearing the reports of this study, one well-known critic of the public school system in America remarked, “I think its safe to say we’ve done a good job of addressing any worries we might have had about our children’s self esteem.”

Where did these narcissistic tendencies originate — and why? (Read on …)

Today, the Ames (Iowa) Tribune reports that eminent astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez has been denied tenure at Iowa State University. This may seem unworthy of a news report … unless you understand who Gonzalez is and why this is happening to him. Guillermo Gonzalez’s simple shortcoming is that he has the audacity to not tote the party line along with his fellow scientists.

If that is a criterion for academic shunning, Copernicus, Einstein and Darwin should have been hog-tied, gagged and left to rot in a dungeon somewhere.

While the published criteria for receiving tenure at ISU consists:

“‘primarily on evidence of scholarship in the faculty member’s teaching, research/creative activities, and/or extension/professional practice’ … In addition to that, Gonzalez’s department of astronomy and physics sets a benchmark for tenure candidates to author at least 15 peer-reviewed journal articles of quality.”

Gonzalez has published 68 peer-reviewed articles — 23 of those since he arrived at ISU in 2001.

No, Gonzalez’s “problem” is not that he is deficient intellectually, academically or professionally. Gonzalez’s “problem” is that, in the opinion of those who control the levers of power both within the scientific community in general and at ISU specifically, he doesn’t think properly. (Read on …)